Actually i ma using AMD radians HD 3300. Now I know the E8400 is better, but I was wondering if all 3 were overclocked at 3.5ghz, how much better is the HD 3300 compared to the others? Can anybody have any benchmarks. Please suggest. Thanks in advance.
I will compare with UnikaSniper TAC53-DF + Player Limited Edition All-solid capacitor motherboard design, based on AMD 790GX + SB750 chipset, support HT3.0 bus technology, and by upgrading BIOS that Can support the latest 45nm AMD Processor Phenom II. Motherboard integrated HD 3300 graphics core, supports DX10 effects and high definition hardware decoding, display the core frequency up to 700MHz, and more similar products, fully meet the main stream Network Games and even some large-scale 3D game hardware configuration requirements.
If the 9400GT is DDR2 memory, so performance is even worse performance than the HD3200, not to mention the HD3300, and if DDR3 memory, then performance will be a little stronger than the HD3200 and HD3300 (on-board DDR2 memory) are similar, while the ratio of on-board The HD3300 DDR3 memory weaker, the strength of performance has little to do with the memory size, even the 2G memory of the 9400GT performance is definitely better than HD3300 strong. The rest can also be configured not understand it ask.
HD 3300 is much stronger than the 8400GS. According to industry knowledge disclosed, AMD 790GX code RS780D, not only performance than 780G Radeon HD 3200, and will join the dual PCI-E 2.0 x8 designed to make dual-card support CrossFireX in parallel, the integrated motherboard users also have the opportunity to spend CrossFire technology.
In the HD 3300, the integration of the equivalent low-end DX10 graphics card 2400Pro AMD the level of integrated graphics, according to the manufacturer revealed that the code on this card may 3200, the initial frequency may be 700MHz to 800MHz. HD 3300 will support the North Bridge buffer memory (LFB) technology channels. Some HD 3300 motherboards would own 16-128MB of onboard dedicated graphics memory "SidePort", which is no longer totally dependent on system memory, so help to improve the performance of integrated graphics.
The AMD 780G chipset got the new HD 3200-based line of built-in GPUs off to a vast start, and accessible entry-level having a bet recital and brilliant compatibility from end to end full DirectX 10 support. It did have a quantity of notable failings, but AMD has been fast to address these with the latest 790GX chipset. It has better subsystem performance, full hold up for all Phenom processors, a faster onboard GPU, and even included sideband memory for faster game performance. Even the price is right, and it will definitely attract many potential AMD 790X buyers, and maybe a few 790FX ones as well. This isn't a great release, and we'd like to see a small piece more robust GPU and additional Hybrid Graphics options, but it's positively a step in the right direction.
HD 3200 pretty good, but live at 800x600, 1024x768, I can't play at those resolution in crisis and this is with my rig. I get double the presentation at 1280x1024. Well hold up, in crisis I can play at 1024x768, but in warhead I can't, it becomes choppy, but at 1280x1024, just fine. I acquire about 7-23fps at 1280x1024 low to normal in warhead. I get between 10-28fps at 1024x768 medium to low, or at 1280x1024 low to medium, 7-19.
0 comments:
Post a Comment